Home Who we serve M&A advisors
Who we serve — M&A advisors & boutique banks

Lists that survive the mandate review

Every advisor eventually faces the question that decides the relationship: how do we know this list is complete?

When the list came from the same databases the client could license, there is no good answer.

When it came from the entire classified web — with evidence per inclusion and a documented exclusion log — there is.

100M+
domains as the starting pool
2-sided
buy-side lists & buyer books
White-label
unbranded deliverables

The advisor’s uncomfortable arithmetic

Coverage is the raw material of advisory judgment — and the economics of producing it are broken in three places.

Shared databases, zero differentiation

Licensed databases return the same names to every subscriber — and clients increasingly license them too. A corporate buyer can now check your long list against the same index it came from.

Manual research burns junior hours

Googling candidates one by one, pasting founding years into a tracker — it consumes the analyst hours meant for advisory work and still only covers what someone thought to search for.

Coverage gaps are asymmetric

A fund that misses a target misses a deal. An advisor who misses one gets asked about it by name in the mandate review — by the client who found it on their own.

The buy-side miss

The company the client’s CEO heard about at a trade show — and that no database returned.

The sell-side miss

The strategic buyer two adjacencies away whose website describes exactly the capability gap your client fills — invisible to league tables that index past deals, not future logic.

Lists that explain themselves — every inclusion quoted, every exclusion documented — are rarer than they should be, mostly because the tooling to produce them at mandate speed did not exist. That is the gap we fill, quietly, under your letterhead.

One engine, both sides of the mandate

The same full-web screening pipeline powers buy-side long lists and sell-side buyer books — white-label by default.

Buy-side long list

  • Start from 100M+ classified domains, not a licensed index
  • Two passes: triage strips noise; deep extraction reads 15 evidenced signals
  • Deliverable: long list + shortlist candidates + exclusion log, each row with verbatim quotes and source URLs
  • ICP re-runs included — mandates drift; change orders poison relationships

Sell-side buyer book

  • Strategics screened for capability adjacency — whether their services pages describe the gap your client fills
  • Acquisition appetite quoted from their own news and announcements
  • Financial buyers screened for stated platform logic in the vertical
  • The edge: capability fit lives in prose on buyers’ websites, invisible to deal databases, legible at scale
White-label by default: unbranded research files, your mandate, your letterhead. Clients meet your coverage claim, not our logo.

Inside a mandate timeline

1

Days 1–2: intake

The mandate criteria plus your interpretation, turned into screenable definitions. Same-day specimen so you can judge the evidence discipline before the engagement letter’s ink dries.

2

Week 1: initial scan

For live processes, a first strategic scan can land inside a week — the obvious universe, scored and evidenced, enough to start conversations while the full sweep runs.

3

Weeks 2–3: full universe

Complete screen with analyst verification: long list, shortlist candidates, exclusion log, all CRM-ready. Buyer books typically run 10–15 business days.

4

Through close: re-runs

Criteria shift as the process teaches; the universe re-scores under the refined ICP at no charge. The list stays defensible at every review.

CRM
Structured rows, ready to import
Mandate review
Coverage exhibit with evidence
Junior desks
Research layer they no longer hand-build
The pipeline does in days what an analyst team does in weeks — but it does research, not advisory. Advisors who use us well redeploy junior hours up the value chain. The buy-side long list use case shows the deliverable anatomy row by row.

The signals that make lists defensible

Every row carries all fifteen framework signals. Five recur in advisor work.

Strategic fit to thesis

Fit scored against the mandate text — the column your client reads first, with supporting sentences quoted per company. When the review asks why a name is ranked where it is, the answer is on the row, not in an analyst’s memory.

Compliance & regulated-market readiness

For regulated verticals, certifications are inclusion criteria — ISO/IEC 17025, ASME stamps, AS9100, ITAR, NADCAP — captured as exact claim text, because the difference between “certified” and a named accreditation scope is the difference between a lead and a liability.

Geographic & branch footprint

Stated footprints and service areas — owned locations distinguished from partner mentions — for geographic mandates. An HQ pin misrepresents half the service economy; a client with a density thesis deserves the map companies actually publish.

Acquisition-program / roll-up readiness

Buy-side, group ownership zeroes candidates out with the quote attached. Sell-side the signal inverts: visible acquisition programs, quoted from buyers’ own news pages, are the appetite evidence that ranks strategics.

Website/news activity trajectory

Activity trajectory flags dormant companies before they reach a client meeting. A list carrying visibly dead businesses costs more credibility than any coverage gain earns back; dated-content analysis is the cheap insurance against it.

A specimen exclusion log — the part clients remember

The artifact that wins mandate reviews is, counterintuitively, the list of companies you did not include.

Group-owned exclusion

A keyword-perfect candidate excluded because its own site states it is “a wholly owned subsidiary of a global industrial group.” Quote captured, source page cited.

Insufficient evidence

A genuinely fitting company flagged because only four signals were extractable — rather than force-ranked to pad the count.

Hidden fit found

A shop whose homepage reads stamping and assembly, whose capability pages reveal precision machining depth — the profile a keyword search skips.

~10%
of keyword-perfect candidates are already group-owned — a list that catches them all teaches the client to trust the rows that remain.
~20%
of confirmed fits lack the category’s obvious homepage keywords — candidates the client’s own database could never show them.
The labor math

A defensible long list built by hand — every candidate visited, evidence noted, exclusions documented — runs to analyst weeks per mandate. The pipeline produces the defensible version in days, below the cost of spot checks alone. Juniors shift from triage to qualification calls and positioning — the work that trains a junior into an advisor.

Specimens are public across eleven verticals, from precision machining to boiler & steam. Bring one hidden fit to a review and the completeness question stops being asked.

Sector coverage as a boutique strategy

The strongest use of this engine by advisors is not per-mandate at all — it is the standing sector universe.

A boutique that claims a vertical should be able to prove it, and a maintained census of the sector is the proof: every operator, every ownership change as it happens, every entrant, held current on a quarterly cadence.

Pitches change first. Walking into a bake-off with the sector already censused. we track 460 companies in this space;. 61 have changed hands in three years;.

here is where your business sits in that structure. is a coverage claim no generalist can counter, and it is deliverable on day one of the mandate because it existed before the mandate did.

Origination changes second. The standing universe surfaces its own conversations: the quarterly delta that shows a consolidator accelerating is a reason to call sell-side prospects;.

the cluster of companies adding the same service line is a thesis to bring buy-side clients;. the conference exhibitor list screens against the universe in an afternoon.

Boutiques that run this loop stop treating research as mandate overhead and start treating it as the origination engine — which, in a fee business, is the difference between waiting for processes and starting them.

The economics fit the strategy: one monitored thesis from €18,000 a year is less than a fraction of one success fee, covers every mandate the sector produces, and compounds — the universe your team annotated through last year’s mandates is unreproducible by a competitor starting today.

Sector focus is the boutique’s moat; a maintained census is what makes it visible to clients.

Economics per mandate, not per seat

Advisory economics are engagement-shaped, so the pricing is too.

A Proof project from €4,900 covers a scoped screen — many banks first use it on a live mandate as a controlled test against their internal process.

The Full universe with deep shortlist from €9,900 is the standard per-mandate engagement: complete long list or buyer book, evidence throughout, exclusion log included.

Annual monitoring from €18,000 per thesis suits advisors running standing sector coverage — a maintained universe in your core vertical that every new mandate draws from on day one, which is how boutiques turn sector focus into a structural head start.

How firms absorb the cost varies: some pass it through as mandate expenses, some absorb it against saved analyst weeks, some price it into a coverage guarantee that itself wins pitches.

All three work because the per-mandate figure sits well under one junior-analyst month.

Public pricing is on the pricing page; the conference prioritization use case is a popular low-stakes first engagement — a client’s trade-show exhibitor list, screened to a ranked meeting book inside a week.

What we are to an advisor — and what we are not

We are a research subcontractor with unusual coverage: the full classified web, an evidence discipline built for skeptical review, and white-label output.

We are not a competing advisor — we take no mandates, contact no companies, and touch no process.

We are also not a financials vendor: no revenue or EBITDA estimates appear in any deliverable, because websites do not contain them and your fairness work deserves better than page-text guesses.

Financial screening stays with your team and its licensed sources; our rows carry what companies actually publish.

Two standards notes an advisor should know before proposing us into a mandate.

Deliverables contain no claims about owners’ intentions — where transition context is relevant it appears only as published, website-visible facts: founder-associated, long-established, independently positioned businesses with an identifiable decision-maker and limited visible leadership bench.

And we decline mandates in consumer-captive care verticals entirely; the list is on the standards page. Advisors have told us these refusals read well in front of clients.

That is not why we hold them, but it is a convenient side effect.

What we refuse to sell: no “ready to sell” flags, no revenue or EBITDA guesses, no owner-age profiling, no distress detection — and no engagements in consumer-captive verticals. Read our standards; serious buyers tell us this page is why they trusted the rest.

Questions advisors ask before the first mandate

Yes. Deliverables ship as unbranded structured files — no logo, no attribution, no watermark — formatted to drop into your templates. Your client sees your coverage claim and your letterhead. We are contractually a subcontractor; confidentiality runs to your engagement, and we take no position and no credit in your process.

Usually. A first strategic scan lands inside a week; full universes and buyer books run two to three weeks depending on category size; the same-day specimen means you can judge quality before committing a live mandate to us. What we will not do is compress past the analyst-verification step — a fast list that fails review is slower than a careful one.

Each engagement’s thesis, universe, and scoring are confidential to that client, never pooled or resold. If two advisors bring overlapping mandates, each is built independently and neither learns of the other. Where a direct conflict would make that untenable — same asset, opposing sides — we decline the second engagement. It has happened; the policy costs us revenue and preserves the only asset that matters.

No — we rank by evidenced fit and visible appetite: capability adjacency quoted from the buyer’s own pages, acquisition history from their announcements, platform logic from sponsors’ stated strategies. Willingness and price are your craft, not a database field. What the book changes is the denominator: every credible buyer visible on the web, not the subset a league table remembers.

Whatever level of disclosure your process needs. Most advisors describe the method generically — full-web screening with LLM analysis, evidence per inclusion — without naming us, which the white-label supports. For processes where methodology scrutiny is expected, we supply a technical annex describing the two-pass architecture, signal framework, and verification step, written to be quoted.

Within reason, yes. The underlying deliverable is a structured file with stable columns — signals, scores, quotes, source URLs, classification status — and we map it to your template, column names, and shortlist conventions at delivery rather than forcing your analysts to reshape it per mandate. Most firms settle on a house mapping after the first engagement and reuse it; the goal is that the file lands looking like your work product, because contractually and presentationally it is.

Bring a live mandate’s criteria — get the specimen same day

Twenty companies, every classification justified, exclusion log included, unbranded. Judge it against what your juniors would have built.

Request the specimen report